World Net Daily reports California to welcome polygamists. This is not the first time (since the court ruling declaired Prop 22 which defines marriage as a union between one man and one woman is a violation of inalienable [God given] human rights) that the scope of the ruling has been considered.

The basis of the ruling is that the definition of marriage in Prop 22 that a marriage is between a Man and a Woman, is a violation of the rights of homosexuals because they don't want to marry a person of the opposite sex.

The same arguement can be given to bisexuals who feels a need to have two spouses — one same-sex and one opposite-sex, as ADF attorney Glen Lavy has pointed out for the LA Times ... The article goes into "Next up: polygamy and incest."

Unlikely? How likely is it that a court would throw out a law that is based on: international tradition, US has treaties with other countries, reject the requests of other states to stay the ruling to aviod legal chaos, and the law itself was voted on and passed by a large majority.

TownHall's Frank Pastore post - Same-Sex Marrriage: Giant Leap in the Wrong Direction looks objectively at history and the effects of Same-Sex marriage on society (those who don't learn from history a doomed to repeat it).

No society in history has ever granted same-sex marriage while maintaining prolonged prohibition of polygamous and incestuous relationships.