- Prop 8 does not affect rights
- The problem with the courts conclusion is that marriage is a right of two people who are in love. The court does not have control of what comes out of pandora's box. If it is the right of two men to get married because they are in love then it is not fair to not allow to brothers that are in love. The court can not do due diligent research on an issue and write status that have the necessary restrictions of good law. All the court can do is strike down laws. Prop 8 is needed to define marriage, after the court said marriage , as it has been, is unconstitutional.
Talking points
• Gay Rights / Special Rights •
Documentary - July 30th - Protection of Marriage, conference call expanded
- Florida and Arizona sites will be participating in the Wednesday conference.
On Nov 1st The Call will be in San Diego at the Qualcomm Stadium.
- Christians accused of hatred and bigotry
- Ad Hominem attacks accusing Christians of hatred and bigotry have been appearing in pro homosexual marriage sites. A publisher of the bible has been / is a target of a Bible lawsuit which claims, "The Bible that refer to homosexuality as a sin violate his constitutional rights and have caused him emotional pain and mental instability."
- Is the same sex marriage ruling a violation of separation of powers?
- The California Constitution, only give the voters authority to amend or repeal the marriage statute limiting marriage to one man and one woman (Prop 22).
- June 25th Wake Up Call to Church on Marriage
- Item 8 of the Declarations For Protecting Biblical Marriage ... We repent of our failure to adequately and effectively protect biblical, heterosexual marriage.
- Homosexual Agenda: Protect Marriage Amendment Initiative taken off ballot
- “Equality California and its allies are desperate to evade democracy. First, they used the courts to erase the votes of nearly 5 million Californians who voted to protect marriage. Now, they are trying to silence the people’s voice forever,” said ADF Senior Counsel Glen Lavy.
- Homosexual Agenda "Make Change, Not Lawsuits"
- A document jointly worked on an signed by ACLU, GLAD, Lambda Legal, NCLR, Equality Federation Freedom to Marry, glaad. Human Rights Campaign, and National Gay and Lesbian Task Force ... The document Make Change, Not Lawsuits.
- National impact of California's Gay Marriage
- Supporters of the proposed Arizona amendment predict that same-sex couples will go to California, get married and subsequently file legal challenges in Arizona courts in attempts to get their unions recognized.
- Same Sex Ruling - Lawless Marriages - polygamy
- The same arguement can be given to bisexuals who feels a need to have two spouses — one same-sex and one opposite-sex, as ADF attorney Glen Lavy has pointed out for the LA Times ... The article goes into "Next up: polygamy and incest."
- Gay Marriage • Don't Ask, Don't Tell • Controversy
- Legalizing same-sex “marriage” is not a stand-alone policy; Marriage is an institution that requires recognition by other institutions both public and private. This recognition has been to the benefit of families, as traditional marriage has been for the benefit of families. Marriage protects children the policies created in public and private institutions have been created in many cases to protect children. Same-sex marriage is a creation of the State, it does not serve the same purpose as traditional marriage.
- Gay Marriage Constitutional Amendment(s) - Seven more states
- In this election, voters in Colorado, Idaho, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia and Wisconsin all adopted marriage protection amendments
- Pacific Justice Institute: California Supreme Court Denies Rehearing and Stay of Gay Marriages
- Press release from Pacific Justice Institue
- Liberty Counsel Will Ask California Court To Stay Opinion Until Californians Vote On Marriage
- Press release from Liberty Counsel, asking for a stay of ban on same sex marriage ruling, to prevent legal chaos.
- ADF, LC Traditional Marriage vs ACLU Gay Marriage
- After ACLU circumvented the Legislature and the will of the people.
- Same-Sex [sic] Marriage - Dr. Dobson Outraged
- “The will of the people has now arrogantly been declared null and void,” ... “In so doing, the justices have undermined and endangered the basic building block of society, which has been honored and preserved in every nation on earth through most of human history."
- ACLJ: CA Supreme Court 'Overreached' by Issuing 'Flawed' Decision on Same-Sex Marriage
- decision by the California Supreme Court striking down the state ban on same-sex marriage is another problematic example of an activist judiciary
- Pacific Justice Institute Statement on Overturning Gay Marriage Ban
- Brad Dacus, president of Pacific Justice Institute, stated, "This is a classic case of judicial activism at its worst. This decision will now make the passage of the Marriage Protection Act critical for the survival of the will of the people of California."
- Judicial Watch Press Statement on Overturning Gay Marriage Ban
- Judicial Watch filed an amicus brief with the California Supreme Court that asked it to uphold the traditional definition of marriage. The brief, available here, noted that “judges are not free to rewrite statutes to say what they would like or what they believe to be better social policy.”
- World Net Daily
- World Magazine
- Focus on the Familty
- Christian Exodus Mandate
- Day of Truth
- United States Justice Foundation
Pacific Justice Institute
- PJI News Releases
- Defense of Marriage Act
- Alliance for Marriage
- Marriage Watch
- Parents and Friends of ExGays and Gays
- Becket Fund
- Family Foundation
- MassResistance!
- American Family Association
- Americans for Truth
- Witnessing to Homosexuals
Same Sex Marriage • Controversy
| © 2002-08 Jeremiah Films. All rights reserved. | Release Announcements |
|---|